Contextualizing and Critiquing the Poliheuristic Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How Do Leaders Make Decisions? A POLIHEURISTIC PERSPECTIVE
Poliheuristic theory (PH) bridges the gap between cognitive and rational theories of decision making. PH postulates a two-stage decision process. During the first stage, the set of possible options is reduced by applying a “noncompensatory principle” to eliminate any alternative with an unacceptable return on a critical, typically political, decision dimension. Once the choice set has been redu...
متن کاملStepping into Mindful Education: A Teacher Educator’s Narrative of Contextualizing a SLTE Curriculum
Initiation into contextualizing mindful second language teacher education (SLTE) has challenged teacher educators causing their retreat into mindless submission to ready-made standardized directives. To revive the starting perspective in curriculum development in light of the recent trend towards responsive SLTE, this practitioner research investigated how the context was incorporat...
متن کاملChinese Choices: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1950–1996
This paper uses the Poliheuristic Theory (PH), developed by Mintz, which incorporates both psychological and rational choice components in a synthesis of these previously isolated approaches, to explain decision making in Chinese foreign policy crises. China is an interesting initial case for this project for two reasons. One is its importance as a permanent member of the UN Security Council an...
متن کاملشیوۀ نوین خوانش متن معماری مبتنی بر نظریۀ بینامتنیت: (نمونۀ موردی: مسجد الغدیر)
One of the major challenges in the field of architecture is the reading and critiquing individual works regardless of relevant textual layers that may affect the formation of the work. The main concern of the present research is the great importance of criticism to the architectural community. Unfortunately however, the lack of systematic readings of architectural works has led to the absenc...
متن کاملOrientalism Beyond Belief: Critiquing the Problematics of V. S. Naipaul’s Islamic Excursion
This study aims to offer a critical analysis of V. S. Naipaul’s second Islamic travelogue Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions Among the Converted Peoples (1998), which chronicles the author’s excursions to the 4 non-Arab Muslim countries of Indonesia, Iran, Pakistan, and Malaysia. This critique is presented, firstly, through problematizing the author’s theorization on the theme of Muslim conversi...
متن کامل